Bible Readings for Friday January 14th, 2011 – The 2nd Week of Epiphany
*Click on each bible passage to expand the text.
Ah, Jacob. *sigh*
The man whom God would name Israel: learned, cunning, and infinitely frustrating becuase of the subsequent moral applications of this passage in Genesis 27 by ill-advised men throughout history.
This entire showdown between Jacob and Esau began while the twins were still in Rebekah’s womb. Worried she asked God why they fought so much inside her:
Genesis 25
23. The Lord said to her,“Two nations are in your womb,
and two peoples from within you will be separated;
one people will be stronger than the other,
and the older will serve the younger.”
In-utero, Jacob was prophesied to usurp his brother’s birthright, and to illustrate the point, while Esau was born first, Jacob came out holding his heel. Jacob literally means, “heel-grabber” or “usurper”.
I have been reading commentaries where various Rabbis and Christian commentators go so far as to describe Jacob as Issac’s moral, gentle, and wise son. Esau however, gets a more critical treatment being described as violent, untrustworthy, and immoral. Basically, they argue Esau deserved what was coming to him. “Bad things only happen to bad people…”
What?? Where is any of that in Genesis? Talk about a extra-biblical narrative to justify Jacob’s deceitful actions! None of those qualities of each man are even so much as implied in the bible. Jacob sat at home in a tent and hardly ventured out. Esau was a stout outdoors-man. Jacob conned his brother out of the birthright earlier in life by making a desperate and famished Esau swear it over to Jacob before he would share a bowl of stew. That’s it. That’s what we know of their character by this point in Genesis.
And some bible commentators have said that Jacob deserved the birthright and the blessing, because, “Esau had no value in it. No man should give it up so easily”. Therefore, whoever values it more has the right to take it?? Hmmmmmmm, unfortunate consequences have come of that interpretation. It basically allows for wholesale relocation and sacking of peoples and property, as long as the Jewish and Christian invaders “value” what they’re taking more than the victims.
All of this culminates in Jacob’s unlawful deception of Issac, and the stealing of Issac’s blessing of Esau which contained therein the spiritual inheritance of God’s covenant with the descendants of Abraham and Issac. The Messiah, the future of Israel and the Western world depends on a deceit. Fascinating. However this is to show the fragile and transient nature of man’s blessings. While God’s covenant is true and whole, man can alter it’s course. God never stipulated which generations of Abraham would receive the covenant. That decision is up to the patriarchs to contemplate in each generation. Issac was ready to select Esau, his firstborn. Jacob and Rebekah decided otherwise. And history was changed forever.
Does this mean that God caused this betrayal by Jacob? Does this mean God favored Jacob because he allowed Jacob’s deceitful actions to prosper unchallenged? Not at all. It simply shows that God is the seat of fidelity, not man. While through God’s ultimate blessing, free-will, man can choose to be unlawful and deceitful, God will always keep his word to us. And, most amazingly, God can find ways of turning our terrible decisions into some form of good later on. It doesn’t justify us or our actions, but it does show God’s fidelity to us.
However, the New Testament passage from Acts 1 goes even farther to illustrate to what length God will go to express his unconditional love and the everlasting fidelity of his covenant with man. What are the requirements of receiving God’s blessing, through baptism in the Holy Spirit?
- Do you have to be from a certain lineage, like the line of David? No.
- Do you have to be of a certain character? No, the apostles (like ourselves) were notoriously weak and faithless people.
- Do you have to be of a certain class, with means and power at your disposal? No.
The beauty of the New Testament is, empowered by Christ’s sacrifice, God’s blessing through baptism of the Holy Spirit became open and free to everyone! And no amount of deceit or betrayal amongst brothers and friends can change that. There’s nothing to steal away. If Isaac had had another blessing for his firstborn son Esau, none of Jacob’s actions would have mattered.
And so today’s readings teach us never to put our faith in blessings and promises of men. They can be altered, broken and stolen away. We are to put our faith only in the blessing of God, in baptism through the Holy Spirit. Trust in it and rejoice in it, and God’s fidelity to us will always endure. Maybe it won’t always manifest in ways we want, but in God’s wisdom it is always the right way. Sometimes it takes a while for the wisdom of these things to reveal itself…



I don’t disagree with your conclusions about the Jacob / Esau birthright struggle. But what about the statement at Romans 9:13 (“Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.”)? How does that statement square in with the idea that God did not take amside in this matter?