Daily Devotion: A Choice Between Nonviolence or Nonexistence

Bible Readings for Saturday April 2nd, 2011 – The 4th Week of Lent

*Click on each bible passage to expand the text.

Psalm 23

1 Samuel 15:32-34

John 1:1-9

I wonder…

The true light, which enlightens everyone, was coming into the world… and the darkness did not overcome it.

Does it? Did it?

Why does (God forgive me) the Word of God seem so impotent at times? How can it fall on what seems like such fertile soil, the heart of one who seems to see the light, and yet such darkness can remain.

Yesterday, my beloved friend and pastor confronted me on Jesus’ doctrine of subversive non-violence. He demanded that I reveal my hypocrisy by admitting there were actually things I would be willing to kill for: if my family were threatened, or if others were being killed in the name of injustice… but I still insist there are no such things that I would take another’s life over. I would rather mine be lost for their sake. I believe in the veracity of the Word of God, on this point most especially.

I MUST believe in this with all my heart my soul and strength. It was this very belief that sustained Jesus, Ghandi, and Martin Luther King, Jr!

Rather than compromise their beliefs to the instincts of self-preservation, the irrefutable logic of worldly-wisdom, and the irresistible persuasion of fear, they persevered through all of it and payed the ultimate price… and changed the world.

Matthew 26

50. Jesus said to him, “Friend, do what you came to do.” Then they came up and laid hands on Jesus and seized him.

51. And behold, one of those who were with Jesus stretched out his hand and drew his sword and struck the servant of the high priest and cut off his ear. 52. Then Jesus said to him, “Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword.

53. Do you think that I cannot appeal to my Father, and he will at once send me more than twelve legions of angels?

I imagine Jesus’ detractors exclaimed:

“What a fool!”

“Where are your angels now, Son of God??”

Jesus had a choice, to fight or die. He had a chance to prove he was powerful and God’s righteousness was with him.

Yet, he chose to die, becuase he knew the power it would carry. Take the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection, take everything religious out of it: Jesus’ astounding willingness to die for the sake of his beliefs still carried such shock-value, such an unbelievable commitment, it made even the Roman empire take notice, and was still powerful enough to change the world.

If strict adherence to subversive-non-violence were easy to accomplish, everyone would have mastered it eons ago. And yet we still live in a world dominated by the sword.

However, this is an ideal. I admit it: I speak in the language of idealism when, in fact, The Way of the Lord is impossible! We all will fail daily to live up to it’s demands on us and that is why we need Grace. Yet the presence of Grace does not neuter the Word. In fact, the impossible nature of it gives the Word authority.

Grace makes the impossible all the more imperative to our progress, becuase in time and in faith, all things are possible in God. We simply need to declare it so, and strive for it ceaselessly, without excuse or compromise.

We must never fail to preach the absurd. We must never give in to the darkness. We must be made fools before the world, for the sake of the Lord. For the sake of ourselves.

“Don’t get panicky. Don’t do anything panicky. Don’t get your weapons. If you have weapons, take them home. He who lives by the sword will perish by the sword. Remember that is what Jesus said. We are not advocating violence. We want to love our enemies. I want you to love our enemies. Be good to them. This is what we must live by. We must meet hate with love.”

- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., shortly after his house was bombed.

“For years now, we have been talking about war and peace. But now, no longer can we just talk about it. It is no longer a choice between violence and nonviolence; it’s nonviolence or nonexistence.”

- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., the night before he was shot in the head by a sniper.

 

Trig Bundgaard About Trig Bundgaard

Thanks for reading. I would love to hear your feedback, thoughts and ideas about what I've written. Especially if it's contrary to my views!

If you liked what you read, please share it. If you didn't like what you read, please share it.

Grace and peace to you!

Romans 5
"18. Therefore just as one man's trespass led to condemnation for all, so one man's act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all.
19. For just as by the one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man's obedience the many will be made righteous."

Comments

  1. Renee Guerrero says:

    I have grappled with this for years. I sometimes say I am a pacifist, but even as I hear the words coming out ..I feel and hear the hypocrisy gong. Really? Would I? Turn the other cheek, give everything to my enemy? Not out of cowardice but because in the act of sacrifice there is something beyond, It is essentially what Jesus did in our universe. God beaten, degraded and killed while in those moments expressing a devotion and love to the ones with the whips, spit and malett. WOW! …thanks for sharing your thoughts …

  2. I know of a writer who was just as passionately idealistic about non-violent resistance to injustice and evil. His name was Dietrich Bonhoeffer, but in the face of the great evil of Nazism his strict pacifism was abandoned for a more balanced perspective.

    After leading the Confessing Church movement in Germany (a movement of subversive non-violent resistance to the Nazis), he concluded that Hitler must be assassinated for the greater good of humanity.

    He and his fellow conspirators failed, but the allies succeeded in stopping Hitler.

    As a matter of fact, the annual commemoration of his death is April 9th this week. Linked to a plot to kill Hitler, he was hanged shortly before the end of the war.

    I am convinced that a balanced approach transforms the world more effectively. That is, a balance between subversive non-violent resistance (whenever and wherever possible) and violent resistance (when all else fails).

    If not for the use of violent resistance to evil and injustice there would be no US Constitution or we would all be under an Orwellian global Nazi regime.

    By the way, what does your wife, Char, think of your assertion that you would never ever use violent force to protect her and the kids????

    I have to be honest and consistent with my own conscience on this. Although I’m a lover and bridge-builder (not a fighter), I can’t preach strict pacifism if I know deep down in my soul that I’m not a strict pacifist…

    By God’s Grace, Tim

    • I think I need to be more clear on one thing.

      I am not saying that strict pacifism is an invalid or impossible way of living the Kingdom of God. I recognize that Buddha, Jesus, Gandhi and others have really walked their talk of strict pacifism.

      What I am saying is that a middle path between subversive non-violent resistance (whenever and wherever possible) and violent resistance (when all else fails) is best FOR ME — and I am able to teach and walk this middle path of the Kingdom of God with integrity.

      Both paths are valid, but only one is for me.

      I do not expect the Gandhis of our world to convert to my line of thinking.

      My focus was on you, Tryg, not on everyone who professes strict pacifism in all circumstances.

      I was simply saying that I am skeptical of your professed non-violence in all scenarios…

      Grace & Peace, Tim

  3. John Waltz says:

    You are right on that we are infallible, but I do believe we are missing our values. The one value that sticks out from this is that we should always put community above ourselves. This should answer the question of whether we resort to violence or not.

Speak Your Mind

*